<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How does one prove that domains of positivity of symmetric nondegenerate bilinear forms are self-dual cones?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://winephysicssong.com/2010/02/26/how-does-one-prove-that-domains-of-positivity-of-symmetric-nondegenerate-bilinear-forms-are-self-dual-cones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://winephysicssong.com/2010/02/26/how-does-one-prove-that-domains-of-positivity-of-symmetric-nondegenerate-bilinear-forms-are-self-dual-cones/</link>
	<description>Howard Barnum's blog on art, music, culture, science, public affairs, philosophy, and life</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Howard Barnum</title>
		<link>http://winephysicssong.com/2010/02/26/how-does-one-prove-that-domains-of-positivity-of-symmetric-nondegenerate-bilinear-forms-are-self-dual-cones/#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Barnum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 05:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winephysicssong.com/?p=438#comment-816</guid>
		<description>I've posted what I think is the answer at &lt;a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/16527/proof-that-domains-of-positivity-of-symmetric-nondegenerate-bilinear-forms-are-se" rel="nofollow"&gt;mathoverflow&lt;/A&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve posted what I think is the answer at <a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/16527/proof-that-domains-of-positivity-of-symmetric-nondegenerate-bilinear-forms-are-se" rel="nofollow">mathoverflow</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
